What is your biggest frustration about legalporno?

[jasonX87]

What do you think legalporno needs to stop doing?

For me there are a few things that annoy the fuck out of me.

1 Transsexuals, i am so not into gay porn so please stop putting transsexuals on this site, create a different site for it. How can you say that you are not gay or bi but still enjoy watching this.

2 Piss drinking, it is disgusting, the old content from LP was so much better when there was almost no piss drinking, if this turns you on i wouldnt be suprised if you would be turned on by poopsex.

3 Terrible actors, please get rid of Ian scott, Erik everhard, and BigGbaby with that stupid cap on his head, dump them in the gay porn or something.

4 Camera angles, for me i like it when a dp is shot directly from behind, so you can see how both holes get fucked, but dp's are shot almost everytime from the side, i dont care how a girls face is with a third cock in her mouth, show how her holes get destroyed.

There are probebly more things that annoy me but these are the biggest for me

[customer406]

that pictures are not in full-res in the galleries, but only in downloads. if that would change, the site would be perfect.

[z20502040]

Agree with you +

-girls with fake boobs, it's horrible

-tired to see always the same models, bring back newcomers

[drevokocur66]

Tip fucking, partial penetration.

[greenfunk727]

Fake cum

[lemmy123]

What do you think legalporno needs to stop doing?

For me there are a few things that annoy the fuck out of me.

1 Transsexuals, ...

I strongly disagree. I hope, they will continue with TS-Scenes

2 Piss drinking ...

I also strongly disagree. I hope, they will continue with piss drinking.
And by that I mean really drinking, not pretending to drink and in reality it's just spilling.

And that - pretending something in the title, what's not in the video - is one of my frustrations.

[Jocke]

Forum members who clearly are not interested in the type of porn offered here but who refuse to leave.

There are plenty of porn sites to choose from. Why stay here?

Legalporno has loyal customers who are here because Legal Porno is offering the things it does. To totally change would be incredibly stupid.

[Eloise]

Forum members who clearly are not interested in the type of porn offered here but who refuse to leave.

There are plenty of porn sites to choose from. Why stay here?

Legalporno has loyal customers who are here because Legal Porno is offering the things it does. To totally change would be incredibly stupid.

This.

[bdsmpretty]

This will be quite a controversial one I suspect, but I feel that generally the vibe of too many of the shoots is getting too heavy and aggressive. OK when the scenes are marketed as 'Mandhandle' or 'Heavy 10-on-1 Domination' etc, but every scene and all the time and it gets boring. And scenes where there is no brutal and dominating vibe to them seem harder to find.

For example, scenes where a model can give male performers oral without the male performer repeatedly whacking her on the back of the head (or hammering his bit into the back of her head as if he were trying to knock in a nail) almost never happen. It's almost always brutal. A long slow (even messy) deepthroat would be less rough and look better, I think.

I get that there often needs to be an 'exaggerated physicality' to gestures on screen to make them look real. That's theatre.
But when it's over-the-top aggressive all the time it often looks fake, even absurd.
It's like someone going into the butchers and punching the dead meat on the shelves. It's unnecessary. It's already tenderized, seasoned, all ready to eat.
There's no need to make a macho drama of dominating it. Maybe just try to relax and enjoy it?

I accept that there's an audience for that here (the 'scenes where a model is shy, uncomfortable, destroyed' crowd, not my scene but each to his/her own), and some female performers actively specialize in performing to satisfy that audience. Pair that audience and those performers up and it all works well.
But I don't think everyone here wants to see it in every scene. I'm pretty sure that not every performer wants to shoot heavy and aggressive in every scene. And for debuts with young and inexperienced performers, going in very heavy (too heavy, as is sometimes obvious) from the start can result in scenes that feel sad and depressing to watch, because (as a viewer) you feel that if a model struggled and was clearly very uncomfortable during a scene, then there is something ugly about you if you try to take pleasure from it.
Everyone is different but I can't enjoy very oppressive-aggressive debuts like that. And I don't think it's only me.

And extending from this 'aggressive debuts' issue (other members have commented on this very point in the threads of models who have gone because of it), it seems the site is losing more than a few potentially amazing new models (debut performers with real long-term prospects) by going in too-hard-too-soon, and being too demanding re acts and intensity before they are ready.
The disappearance of new models such as Nasty, Lagoona, Pinky, etc, after only two or three shoots seems to back that up.

By way of a huge caveat, I am not going to be so arrogant to make a claim that I know better than any of the directors here how to direct a new performer or shoot a scene (re limits, roughness, brutality), because I have never shot an adult scene or been on a porn set in my life. I admit I don't know nothing at all about shooting adult scenes.
All I have are my impressions from the other side of the screen. And from those impressions, it seems to me that there is a increasingly heavy-aggressive (negative) vibe darkening the mood of too many scenes lately.

When I first arrived here the atmosphere of the majority of scenes seemed to be far more positive and brighter in mood. Even fun. I'm referring to the 2015-2016 days of costumes and creme, Timea Bella, Linda Sweet, Foxy Di, etc.
The content was still there. Anal, toys, fisting, and still as much pee (not my thing but always an audience for it here).
But essentially everyone seemed to enjoy themselves during scenes and there was often a party atmosphere to the shoots.
If the site could regain some of that playfulness and positive energy (instead of the dark) I think it might be better for it.

PS. This is meant as constructive feedback (based on theme 'biggest frustration with the site').
And that said (for all it's worth), I still think this is by far the best adult site in the world. The most beautiful models, the best directors, and tons of great content week after week, all year around. So it's a frustration but certainly not a deal breaker at present.

[fuckcunts]

Disagree with the above. I think the biggest frustration is not enough "manhandle." Harder slapping and face-spitting, choking with *some* actual pressure, and such used to be fairly common in American and some Euro porn--time to bring that back. I get that not every scene can be like that but would like more options for this kind of stuff mixed with standard LP fare.

[luvs2_wank]

There are plenty of porn sites to choose from. Why stay here?

Plenty people come here for anal group sex/gangbangs.

Looking at what was released in last 7 days (group sex/gang bangs only by the major original outlets)

Giorgio - 7 scenes 5 with PIss/dry edits
Giorgio Lab - 2 scenes, 1 with piss.
Gonzo - 4 scenes, 2 with piss/dry edits
NRX - 1 - featuring TS.

The dry edits don't please many non piss fans as the 'wetness' is still present in the girls appearance as an example. TS will always divide opinion, the levels/presence of manhandling, the same.

So factoring out the piss/TS, there were 4 dry gangbang scenes (out of the sample of 14).

Drilling down further of the 4 scenes

1 featured 2 heavily tattooed girls - again a real opinion divider ,who have already performed together in a similar scene a few months back.
3 BBC gangbangs - the Nicole Black scene featuring TAP tipfucking and containing zero intensity, Jessy Jay shitting paint out of her arse and Nataly Gold (a great performer but not exactly original content)

With this in mind, name one other porn site that released around 4 DP/DAP gangbangs this week that the OP should take his custom to?

There is a rump of customers who like gangbangs without pissing and I think they would prefer some enhanced choice on a site which is releasing 10 pissing gangbangs a week, the fans of piss must be a seriously wealthy lot to sustain this at around 8 tickets a scene. (80 tks = c2 months of subscriptions)

The roots of this site are found in Sineplex, where pissing was an additional fetish to the group sex/gangbangs, Gonzo and Giorgio's foundations on LP were the same. Now it feels like a pissing site with some anal gangbanging added in.

There are people who want to spend money here buying scenes but feel a touch disenfranchised by the choice when in the past they had a lot more choice, i'm sure a happy medium can exist.

[Bummer-Harris]

Too hard or mean, too many cocks in most scenes.
There seems a huge gap(e) between more mainstream evilangel & firstanalquest type sites and LP/Analvids.

Double anal yes please, but maybe not with an army of giant angry piss streaming cocks in every scene.

Oh yeah must not forget: NO FULL HAIRY BUSH!

[luvs2_wank]

Following on to some additional user comments - there is no question the quality of the girls has gone down, COVID has undoubtedly had an impact on this but it was noticeable pre COVID.

This was a site which had the below as regulars during 2016

Lola Bulgari
Katrin Tequila
Ria Sunn
Lara Onyx
Blanche Bradburry
Gina Gerson
Rebecca Sharon
Sofi Goldfinger
Jessi Empera
Kira Thorn
Crystal Greenvelle
Luna Rival

Amongst many, many others, what chance now of attracting such hot girls (post COVID), when the studio offering says they need to drink the piss of 5 men, 3 times over during a shoot within their first 3-5 scenes.

[Jocke]

I do not buy anything which says manhandle or rough and I agree with bdsmpretty that there is too much aggression in the other scenes. Make a clear difference. Those who want violence can buy the "rough" scenes and the rest of us should get love making, preferably nasty love making ;-)

[bustylady]

...

^ This asshole...

[ExtremePornFan]

Whiny cry babies posting in the forum.

[House MD]

Slow motion Black-only scenes with tip fucking and piss on a trans in a basin which itself is in a cage

[Jocke]

Creative feedback seem to find its way into the scenes, whining fortunately not!

[Freerider]

I don't like piss videos, and transex.
But I'd like to have hard gay videos

[fighthardin321]

What do you think legalporno needs to stop doing?

For me there are a few things that annoy the fuck out of me.

1 Transsexuals, i am so not into gay porn so please stop putting transsexuals on this site, create a different site for it. How can you say that you are not gay or bi but still enjoy watching this.

2 Piss drinking, it is disgusting, the old content from LP was so much better when there was almost no piss drinking, if this turns you on i wouldnt be suprised if you would be turned on by poopsex.

3 Terrible actors, please get rid of Ian scott, Erik everhard, and BigGbaby with that stupid cap on his head, dump them in the gay porn or something.

4 Camera angles, for me i like it when a dp is shot directly from behind, so you can see how both holes get fucked, but dp's are shot almost everytime from the side, i dont care how a girls face is with a third cock in her mouth, show how her holes get destroyed.

There are probebly more things that annoy me but these are the biggest for me

^^This guy sounds like me on my old account...lol

Except for the piss stuff...I like that

[Jack_Jackal43]

What’s frustrating is how the manhandling has become pretend. Like for example when a guy ‘chokes’ a girl he doesn’t actually choke her, he just puts his hand around her neck. I’m not saying to do this to girls who are not consenting, but there’s plenty of girls who love to be choked and slapped hard in the face. Look at Vicky Sol for example, she loves to be slapped and fucked rough.

What I’m saying is if a girl is not into rough sex, don’t pretend it’s a manhandling scene or a bdsm scene. Just give her a Tushy style vanilla scene for the people that want that.

If she is into rough and REAL manhandling, then don’t hold back and take her to her limits.

Look at the difference between Lina Luxxa and Susan Ayn’s manhandling scenes vs May Thai and Jolee Love’s ‘manhandling scenes’. Huge difference.

[Paizal]

The lack of variety with the girls. Often they are very skinny girls or girls with a lot of tattoos. There are rarely girls with larger breasts who are not tattooed from top to bottom. There are also rarely girls who have a butt.

[bdsmpretty]

The roots of this site are found in Sineplex, where pissing was an additional fetish to the group sex/gangbangs, Gonzo and Giorgio's foundations on LP were the same. Now it feels like a pissing site with some anal gangbanging added in.

That's an accurate and concise observation, and how I see it too.

Even though I am not a pee fan, I've defended the existence of pee on the site against the 'no pee ever' people (if the models are comfortable to do it then they have a right to perform as they wish). But pee in every scene is boring. And probably for the performers too.

And another issue is that when you opt for a 'dry' scene, what you get is ultimately not a scene conceived and shot as a dry scene, but actually a longer pee film cut down. So you inevitably lose action where action and pee are mixed.

An introduction of some sort of informal (optional) ratio might be useful to wind expectations back, and restore a balance.
For example two dry and one wet,or one dry and one wet, each studio can ration as they feel will work. But just not every scene.
That 'calming of expectations' would allow performers not wanting to do pee every shoot, and directors/studios not wanting to shoot pee every shoot, some time and space to explore other directions.
Those other directions could be a mix of looking back towards things that worked in earlier incarnations of this site and GG's sites, and exploring newer niches with followings currently crowded out or ignored.

I also suspect there are female performers who may be OK with the occasional pee scene (as a novelty), but would secretly rather not shoot pee as often as they do. But 'business being business', they feel a bit overwhelmed/pressurized to deliver it as often as they do by the expectation from fans here (maybe agencies, studios too) that it should be an option for every scene.
Winding that expectation down to one shoot in three (or whatever) would give them the option of a break if they want it without feeling other performers are doing more and they will be shut out from more work by resisting.

Coincidentally, just this week other members here have been posting seeking old GG scenes from his NoRestForTheAss series (no pee) and praising his GagsGirls series (again no pee) and canvassing support for a new deepthroat series here.
So there seems to be a nostalgia and an underlying demand from many members for something lost that is not pee.

The only negative of such a ratio system (for the above reasons) might be that performers lose out on the pee premium that goes with wet shooting. If they are genuinely happy shooting wet very regularly then that could constitute a pay cut.
I certainly don't want to advocate for that because they work hard for their fees, pee or no pee.

So such a winding back of pee shoot frequency would be a test of the AV market.
Are they genuinely fans of the performers themselves, as performers and personalities, and will support their non-wet content at the same ticket rate as their wet content.
Or are they more fetishists who are more interested in the act that the performer, so will hope from performer to performer just to catch the act. There's the rub! (Hamlet).

I also hear rumours that xxx is juggling the numbers and weighing up that contradiction with a view to broadening this sites scope and appeal beyond the current system. The Amazon of porn, as another member put it. We wait to hear more.

[bdsmpretty]

* 'Or are they more fetishists who are more interested in the act that the performer, so will hop from performer to performer just to catch the act.'

[DPraved]

I also hear rumours that xxx is juggling the numbers and weighing up that contradiction with a view to broadening this sites scope and appeal beyond the current system. The Amazon of porn, as another member put it. We wait to hear more.

I have no actual knowledge of what xxx is planing, but it seems the reasonable conclusion based on how PornBox has developed recently. But if xxx is serious about bringing in third parties to PornBox, he will need a more varied customer base or most third parties will surely fail.

[dap-addict]

Two years ago my biggest frustration was the amount of pussy fucking in anal or 100% anal billed scenes. This got much better since.
Now there isn't much frustration left actually, but 1st for sure one is that manhandle billed scenes are no real manhandle in 99% of cases.
2nd is that majority of anal cream pie scenes are fake creampies nowadays.
3rd is too much wood problems, especially in Russian and LAM shot scenes.
4th is too little balls deep 1on1 anal. Generally anal fucking is often too much of hold back and generally half-brew only.

[CursedLemon]

Let's agree that we all want what we consider good porn. Let's agree that that is different for each individual. And we need to all realize that analvids is not going to change. This is it and, yes, Virginia, quality has gone down over the past couple of years.

To me, the content is not the major issue. TBC the content as worsened, but sticking to the OP theme...
It is the technical things:
audio, there is no balance. You may hear the girl, but the guy talking to her is inaudible. In addition the audio is uneven, sometimes very loud, sometimes barely audible
camera work, very amateurish, really trash and maybe the worst aspect of all "frustrations." No steadiness to camera, lots of jerking, the STUPID "dutch angles," ( Dutch angles are when the camera is tilted about 30-45 degrees. ) The inability or reluctance to get a GOOD angle with good composition and fucking STAY there for a while is the hallmark of someone who really doesn't know how to video. I don't want to move to the next position if what they have is working.
The direction esp of GG (and the GLs that GG directs). All of the analvids scenes are straight formula, porn by check boxes, including the foot between the shoulder blades and many of the other things that others have mentioned, the gratuitous slapping, the GROSS excessive spitting, the focus on pissing; just the misogynistic direction that goes out of its way to be sure the girl has no chance to enjoy the sex.
The props waste time; all of them, including dildos, cages, etc., and are usually boring. Dylan's be-bop hat is childish as is Batty's knit cap. Is that their personna? What a fucking joke.

As for Jocke's rec that if you don't like it here, leave...and I respect that. There was good porn before LP, and there is good porn outside of analvids. It's not hard to find.
Thing is many have left and many more will once they have their fill of all the acrobatic circus misogynistic themes that seep into so many of the videos. I've found many sites more to my liking. Many members will eventually realize that these videos are NOT actress driven, but director driven. What I mean is that one video could have a full blown anal slut, example Nataly Gold, and another could have a girl much more demure, shy, girl-next-door and the action in the video will be the same. The slut will not be treated any rougher or nastier, the shy girl won't have more gentle sex, though still pushing her limits---they will be shot exactly the same, in other words the actress does not matter, esp in SZ and GIO vids. It has been that way for a couple of YEARS now. Evolve! Get a creative bone that doesn't include a new rainbow colored triple headed dildo. Work with the girl's strengths. A square peg does not fit into a round hole even with a rainbow colored dildo.

There are girls out there who are wasted under the direction of analvids, eg Rebel Rhyder. Analvids can't handle Rebel Rhyder, and they don't even try. GG will just plug her into his hackneyed storyboard as if she, by herself, brought nothing to the shoot. (This is just an example)

I won't address the toe sucking of male feet, the drooling spit into an open mouth, the over the top ink, defacing otherwise beautiful breasts, chests, and now even covering the face. That could be all they can find? I hope that they are not seeking that out. I won't address the lack of 2 girl scenes, and even if there are 2 girls the action proceeds independently with each girl, I won't address the lack of any good oral action, or that the pussy might as well be pixelated out.

yes, Analvids has its own style, like it or leave it, but critiquing or suggesting or bemoaning does NO good.
That there is so frequently some new topic posted expressing ideas for "improvement" shows that the member roles are churning...or as PT Barnum put it: there's a sucker born every minute.

Completely agree with this, especially 'porn by check boxes', so much of the content has no passion, soul or creativity. Gonzo is the most guilty of this IMO, cookie cutter scenes with terrible tip fucking 90% of the time, poor camera work and colour grading.. it could and should be SO much better.

That being said at least NRX has produced some interesting scenes the past few months.

GG's videos are technically good and the male talent perform better than Gonzo but it's the same DAP only scene over and over again in the same positions. Rarely even get DP content anymore and it's been years since DVP was thrown in for variety.

The American Anal series was really good but that's been gone for a long time now, I know LP are trying to bring back a replacement but it's still left a void in the mean time.

[2017sucks]

1. TS

2. Too much multi-girl scenes, or just 2 on 1, 3 on 1. Too little 5+ on 1, and none existing 10 on 1 last few months.

3. Idiotic sofa licking fake cum in GIO scenes.

4. Dry SZ guys (probably overused), with retarted cumshot style, so 90% of that misery that goes out from their balls, ends up out from girls mouth.

5. Facials and (or) creampies after tons of piss drinked during the scene. NRX is a leader in that, then Florane.

6. Fake titles, related to 5. when they put "swallow" and no swallow actually.

[pastaga]

Girls just doing one or two scenes then gone forever.
Especially when they're still doing anal for other websites...

[Starrio]

Girls just doing one or two scenes then gone forever...

That ^^^^^

Every hot girl like Sharon White and Alba Lala should have multiple BBC scenes, just one or two scenes isn't enough.

About the TS I never see it because the filter works, so I have no issue with it, just do something about that ugly GIO thumbnail that the filter doesn't hide.

About the piss drinking, all the piss stuff is great, the more the better, and yes, fucking the girls in the ass is the most important part, but seeing the girls getting pissed on is good too.

Things that could get better:

- Prone bone becoming standard on all the scenes, it doesn't have to be on the floor, prone bone looks good on any surface.

- Having more facials and more pee around the eyebrows and nose would be great, they focus too much on the mouth.

- That said, if they are going to aim for the mouth, then do cum swallowing, too much semen gets wasted or mixed with saliva.

- I'm starting to see too much fake cum too, and that makes those scenes look cheap and low quality. Small amounts of real cum is better than big amounts of fake cum. No fake cum should be allowed.

Other than that the site is simply great, which is why we can't get enough of it.

[Eloise]

Two years ago my biggest frustration was the amount of pussy fucking in anal or 100% anal billed scenes. This got much better since.
Now there isn't much frustration left actually, but 1st for sure one is that manhandle billed scenes are no real manhandle in 99% of cases.
2nd is that majority of anal cream pie scenes are fake creampies nowadays.
3rd is too much wood problems, especially in Russian and LAM shot scenes.
4th is too little balls deep 1on1 anal. Generally anal fucking is often too much of hold back and generally half-brew only.

Spot on summary.

[fighthardin321]

I've posted my "frustration" with LP well....For awhile now :/

But yall need to take a step back and realize...

Nobody....And I mean NOBODY! Even comes close to the content they do....Period!

Ok to criticize them...But be gentle to the giant of the industry

[SimplyStunning]

1. 0% Pussy - I will never get the appeal, why limit yourself when you can have all of a beautiful woman.
2. Pissing - I was already made about the amount of 0% pussy scene on the site then came pissing, WTF! Yes pissing has always been around at LP but a very easily avoidable small quantity and it didn't involve the constant consumption of piss.
3. Prolapse - Fucking disgusting, a woman's inside should stay inside.
4. Vomit - Fuck, its like the site is trying to be disgusting simply ??? BECAUSE ???
5. Tranny - I knew it was just a matter of time. Once the 0% pussy got a foothold and showed disgust at the thought of a woman's pussy being touched on this site the next step is why even use a woman? A tranny has no pussy to fuck perfect solution!

[krisb01581]

Nobody....And I mean NOBODY! Even comes close to the content they do....Period!

This x 1,000,000. And I try to remember that any time when there was something I didn't like . As a porn fan my whole life, this site is almost too good to be true.

Seriously, there are literally no other options out there for this type of amazing content. Makes it hard to complain too much.

[YumYum74]

1. Prolapse
2. Prolapse
3. Prolapse

Don't like piss but that's just that: I don't like it. But the prolapse is on a different plane, I actually hate it. And it's inescapable lately, especially at Gio but Gonzo is starting with it more and more as well. I find it revolting, disgusting, whatever you wanna call it.

Case in point: the latest Sasha Beart release would have been an instant buy in any other circumstance, but the prolapse there makes it an instant no-go. Gross.

[dap-addict]

Nobody....And I mean NOBODY! Even comes close to the content they do....Period!

This x 1,000,000. And I try to remember that any time when there was something I didn't like . As a porn fan my whole life, this site is almost too good to be true.

Seriously, there are literally no other options out there for this type of amazing content. Makes it hard to complain too much.

+ 1

This said even with the best product offer we still may bet frustrated sometimes.

[bustylady]

Anal prolapse...

[Ragnar]

1. Prolapse
2. Prolapse
3. Prolapse

Don't like piss but that's just that: I don't like it. But the prolapse is on a different plane, I actually hate it. And it's inescapable lately, especially at Gio but Gonzo is starting with it more and more as well. I find it revolting, disgusting, whatever you wanna call it.

Case in point: the latest Sasha Beart release would have been an instant buy in any other circumstance, but the prolapse there makes it an instant no-go. Gross.

I totally agree. Prolapse also puts me off a scene. That's why I suggested that a prolapse and non-prolapse version should be made available, but I'd prefer it if women weren't encouraged to prolapse.

[House MD]

Biggest frustration is:
1. Piss: today it is overwhelmingly present scattered everywhere within a scene disrupting fucking action. It interrupts introductory blowbangs, then disrupts DAP/DP/DVP midway and finally it ends with golden shower and the latter is even more retarded when the dicks jizz on the chicks face instead of swallowing then is washed off with piss. Another outrageous stupidity is when the dicks come inside the chicks mouth and then instead of swallowing they mix the goo with piss and makes the chick swallow salt water instead of gooey slime

2. Too many BBC - the scenes are less intense and there's not good chemistry and reflexes to manhandle or kuckmal. I find there is not good standing DPs or brutal sex with blacks

3. 0% pussy is a retarded philosophy. DPs are just as good as DAPs / DVPs. There is no difference for the chick or audiences and there is absolutely no reason not to mix a fair share of DP, DVP, DAP, TPs, etc. Diversity in these positions creates added-value to the scene and to sensations. I'd rather pay million bucks to watch intense DPs than slow motion fake DAPs. That's why I hate those small dicks here who support slow motion DAPs because it's zero pussy.

[JASON15938]

What do you think legalporno needs to stop doing?

For me there are a few things that annoy the fuck out of me.

1 Transsexuals, i am so not into gay porn so please stop putting transsexuals on this site, create a different site for it. How can you say that you are not gay or bi but still enjoy watching this.

You don't like transvids so don't watch them. It is easy and simple PERIOD.
#BRAIN IS MEAN TO BE USED#