xxx wrote:They were not viable. Everything that's not supported enough will disappear.
In other words, they are risky to produce. Nobody wants to lose money, obviously!
I'm a fan of the scenes with just one lady, so for me this is good news, lol.
BUT, maybe if we explain what we don't like about these scenes,
and Gonzo understands it, they can change these and make them more appealing?
I'm rooting for you, orgy-fans. Good luck!
Here is my take:
(I'm just criticising Orgy movies made by Gonzo).
1.- I haven't measured this, but anecdotally, Orgy scenes, have a much longer intro.
That part where there are no men present, is what I call "the intro".
I like, looking at beautiful women just like anyone else, so the intro is not a terrible idea, but,
at LegalPorno, I want to look at beautiful women, having anal sex and males are required. PERIOD.
My interest at "the intro" is almost non-existent to be perfectly honest.
(for me, dildos inserted into women's assholes, does not qualify as "sex") ok?!
IN OTHER WORDS, if a movie total run time is 40 mins, and it spends 20 mins in the intro,
THAT MOVIE, to me, is really only 20 mins long. (the 20 mins of the sex part).
Which to me, this is what I generally remember about Gonzo Orgy scenes.
So, with that in context, measuring against the asking price of ORGY scenes,
which is ALWAYS higher, versus the prevalent 3 on 1 type scene, ORGY just comes up as disproportionately expensive.
EXPENSIVE is a relative term, so what I mean is,
that the standard 3 on 1 scene from Gonzo, offers 30-40 mins of sex, for LESS MONEY.
and therefore it seems like a smarter buy to me.
Also worth mentioning, I prefer scenes with just one girl, not because they are cheaper,
but because all the attention, from the males, goes to that one woman. I like that.
I don't understand why LUIS feels like the intro has to be so fucking long,
but, if you want fans like me to buy those orgy scenes, the sex has to at least be competitive with the
duration of the "3 on 1" scenes.
2.- According to what Giorgio believes, LP fans decide to buy a scene, based on the content, the niches.
I disagree and I think, most people decide to buy, based on the female performer.
There is probably truth to both sides of the argument, but I think, pairing two or three models who are too different
from one another, will make fans who purchase scenes based on the model, decide not to buy that scene,
if the other performers are not aligned to that particular user's taste.
I'm describing myself btw. For example, if you pair, Veronika Clark, a model I think
is incredibly hot and sexy, with an hypothetical model I dislike, I'm not gonna buy that scene.
3.- I think camera work has to be very different.
Luis favours close to semi-close camera style, and I think this doesn't work for Orgies.
What I remember of SINEPLEX, orgy scenes is a camera style that was calmed and composed,
favouring wide takes. shots where you could watch both models at the same time.
For me this is the most important reason why I don't buy Orgy scenes.
Because the camera work just fails at capturing all the action that is happening.
BTW I recently purchased this ORGY scene, because it was two perfectly matched models IMO.
But is also representative of the kind of thing that should happen in an orgy scene,
in these case, double doggy with both girls kissing each other.
There has to be reasons as to why you want two models in the same scene.
This is one of them:
But if you read what I said, this movie suffers from that only 20 mins were sex. 20 mins of sex for 5.6 tkt. EXPENSIVE.
SEE WHAT I MEAN? I felt stinged when that movie came to an end.
Like I don't feel like buying another orgy scene for a while.
I'm gonna remember this when that XMAS orgy scene comes out. lol
But what's your take guys,? are these doomed forever?
