Please no more resistance/punishment porn

Moderator: dan

TheVulture
Veteran Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2015 9:26 pm
Karma: 0

Please no more resistance/punishment porn

Postby TheVulture » Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:09 pm

Just bought my first Glam Porn scene (Simony Diamond & Anita Bellini) basically as I will buy pretty much anything with Simony in it and it looked good from the trailer.

Have to say I'm horrified by the concept, which is Mugur and Simony having consensual sex but Anita being their sex slave and being "forced" to engage in acts with a horrified look on her face and putting up resistance throughout.

What's worse is that this wasn't evident at all from the trailer. You could see a slight slave element with Anita in a submissive role but there was no hint of a non-consensual "vibe".

I'm pretty appalled that LP would create this kind of scene to be honest. What is the point? Who is it aimed at? Does anyone here find this appealing?

Is this likely to be a constant theme with Glam Porn? If so can these scenes at least be labelled as such? (eg "unwilling performer" or something)

Luckily I've only burned 2.1 tickets. What's a real shame though is that Glam Porn is a label that's getting a lot of grief from LP users and I really wanted to buy a few scenes to show my support....and then this. I can definitely support a studio that produces softer content for a lower price but not when it involves this kind of nonsense. Come on LP - sort it out.
More non-manhandle scenes please. Hands away from face/neck/shoulders. Keep the girls loose, free and expressive. Don't overpower them - let them sizzle! Keep the heels on. More panties pulled to one side. More skirts/tight dresses. More 0% pussy scenes.

Return to Glam Porn

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest