Scene Ruined Again for this...

[Slayer21]

I can´t believe this, new scene with Ria Sunn and Timea Bella Ruined for leting the top of the girls all the fricking time, people here in forums wrote again this problem many, many times, and the directors don´t listen, they think is enough show only the asshole with the dick inside (well is ok, this site is about anal) but dudes, many people want see the tits in the scene too, listen LP
Look the scene ruined https://www.legalporno.com/watch/30506/ ... ion_sz1052

[Dudemeister]

Dude, that scene you're talking about was filmed back in 2015. I guess by now they probably got your point, but it's hard to change a scene that was shot three years ago.

[JohnnyMcSpunkencock]

Blah blah blah. They sometimes shoot with, sometimes without. If the directors shot scenes according to the forum posts LP would have probably gone under long ago. More than any other forum, and this is saying plenty, this forum absolutely does not represent what sells well and that is why a great many are here. The 99% majority are very happy and take the rough with the smooth and don't even post here because they're more than happy enough

[Slayer21]

Blah blah blah. They sometimes shoot with, sometimes without. If the directors shot scenes according to the forum posts LP would have probably gone under long ago. More than any other forum, and this is saying plenty, this forum absolutely does not represent what sells well and that is why a great many are here. The 99% majority are very happy and take the rough with the smooth and don't even post here because they're more than happy enough

More, Blah, Bah, Blah...the only way things change is if people or users clain, or point out the things are bad or can be changed to improve a little, I will tell you 1 example about this; a scene, girl is wearing lingerie and shoes, etc, then 80% users like the scene because the girl is using lingerie, but the 20% users like bare feet, or see tits, or full naked, if you film the scene half with lingerie and then you leave bare feet and body naked too, you will win the 100% of buyers, so you win more money and make a GREAT scene, go it? why? because you read in forums some ideas. I hate people who conform with what sellers give them or the rules they giving, like video games now many people buy a unfinish game then spend lot of money in the parts that had to have come in the first delivery, and you can see some like this with porn too (selling scenes in parts, or making low quality scenes. etc) as you can see all this focuses on talking about quality and not being conformists.

PS. I apologize if the scene is old, I hope that LP producers have taken note.

[dap-addict]

I agree with Slayer that users should comment what bugs them here in the forum.
If not here than where?
Of course we all vote with our wallet, but we also know that directors, performers and also management are reading this forum.

[Dudemeister]

I will tell you 1 example about this; a scene, girl is wearing lingerie and shoes, etc, then 80% users like the scene because the girl is using lingerie, but the 20% users like bare feet, or see tits, or full naked, if you film the scene half with lingerie and then you leave bare feet and body naked too, you will win the 100% of buyers, so you win more money and make a GREAT scene, go it?

I know it's just an example to make a point about how writing on a forum helps to improve the overall quality, but I think what you're saying here is not true. I guess a lot of porn watchers tend to enjoy scenes as a whole and will skip most movies that don't cater to their fetishes entirely. Like a bare feet / fully naked lover won't enjoy a scene that only caters to his desires for like half of the time. Same goes for the other faction (lingerie/heels). I mean, some people even can't enjoy a scene if it contains one minute of pussy fucking. So I'd say shooting a little bit of everything for eveyone in the same scene doesn't work.

You wanna shoot a fully clothed scene? Fine, go for it. As long as there are always enough other "pure content" scenes to keep a balance.

Variety is the key to success, but not during a single scene.

[lolek]

Go to your momma and cry.

[cyberhog59]

My God, not every scene should be the same. If variety it ruin it for you, then too bad for you. Perhaps performers were so ready to get their dicks into girls they could not be bothered to take everything off. I think that's hot and don't mind clothes/no clothes; shoes/no shoes doesn't make difference to me. You needledicks and your demands! My answer: tough shit.

[noasswasted]

My God, not every scene should be the same. If variety it ruin it for you, then too bad for you.

Agree, however can understand why Slayer wants to see Ria's tits.
Maybe it should have been taken off half way.

One cool thing about this outfit however is this shot. Sparkly attire hanging over her snatch with the Kid boring her asshole.

[JohnnyMcSpunkencock]

I agree with Slayer that users should comment what bugs them here in the forum.
If not here than where?

That's not the issue. Every time someone has a gripe that's been aired dozens of times rather than post in an already started thread on the subject they open a new one instead. Over and over again.

That aside no company on earth is stupid enough to do one thing only that's irrelevant to the sites theme so, many buyers like shoes, heels, stockings etc and many users prefer bare feet. Many users prefer naked while many prefer clothing. Ergo, a few forum voices venting their spleen over such subjects is a total waste of time as there are as many paying users against as for.

[kidloco2]

For fuck sake, where are some ppl talking here coming from? Not showing tits from the whole scene means variety? Not showing the whole
body means variety? I can't fcukin belive it. You get excited by looking at dressed up girls? You must be really young, unexperienced or stupid. I can't help myself. Sorry.

[Slayer21]

For fuck sake, where are some ppl talking here coming from? Not showing tits from the whole scene means variety? Not showing the whole
body means variety? I can't fcukin belive it. You get excited by looking at dressed up girls? You must be really young, unexperienced or stupid. I can't help myself. Sorry.

lol, thanks, that is what I think about people who say they don´t care clothes on, or they don´t care about see tits, same like you wrote, I think that those who think like that are over exited pre teens that don´t really like woman, they only want see the dick fucking the hole, or they are too pervert that they do not care enjoying the beauty of a woman. I am a man WHO LIKE WOMAN and one of the pleasure of that is see the tits, the legs, the feet, face, hands, butt. etc.
If this thing keep that way, one day we will see full cover with a ded sheet the girl and only a circle cut hole on the ass to insert the dicks.

[kidloco2]

Yeah, exactly, have you even wondered why 'glory hole" like video got so popular?

[JohnnyMcSpunkencock]

lol, thanks, that is what I think about people who say they don´t care clothes on, or they don´t care about see tits, same like you wrote, I think that those who think like that are over exited pre teens that don´t really like woman

See, you're seeing only what you like and can't see the other side. Nudism is not porn. People like feet, food, restricted breathing, being whipped, being manhandled, piss, balloons and so on. You'll probably find that most folk who like clothing types don't worry about seeing tits, feet etc because it isn't what turns them on.