drevokocur66 wrote:@267tix with no wet content to buy.
Jocke wrote:drevokocur66 wrote:@267tix with no wet content to buy.
We got a great Alexa Flexy wet scene, but otherwise I support you. I have bought almost every wet scene except the rough and violent shit. The old wet scenes are more about equal sharing of the sensation. Now it seems like it has to be degrading and rough, just because it is wet.
I only need one or two per week, but if they were with more than one girl I would buy all of them regardless of how many.
dap-addict wrote:4 days on zero tickets!
I tried it but tonight I couldn't resist Vicky Sol - and good so!
Watched old DAPs, some I didnt have time to check out really, but a new release is always a new release!
Gonna do some shopping now!
dap-addict wrote:Just realized that TS and gonzo made it quite easy for me to save some tickets so far in 2020.
Tastes Like Ass wrote:Up until recently, I was having a very hard time, and I was having to reload an extra 120 tickets a month. The reason is that I was trying to buy almost every scene, even if I wasn't sure if I would ever watch it, because I wanted to support LP, as the last company that really seemed to be pushing the porn envelope. But now, since they are apparently moving toward being just another mainstream company, I see no need to do that, so I will probably just buy scenes with girls I really like, or scenes that have lots of ATM/ATOGM, or some other fetish that I really like. I will also probably stop buying any scene where the girl is stripped totally naked for the majority of the sex.
lemmy123 wrote:Since the new pricing policy, it became more easy to economize:
1. no more INSTA_BUYs
I add every video, which I am about to buy, to my wishlist and wait, until I get new tickets. Meanwhile I watch some older unwatched scenes from my stock.
When I get new tickets, I go to my wishlist and decide, which scenes I will really buy. The rest? Well, sorry...
dap-addict wrote:and now the worst: I might not be able to support the girls I want DAP-ed in future that way. But than I can't buy every anal only scene of a girl I like for 3,8 to 4,2tkts now, otherwise I can't buy my DAP fix anymore.
spiny78 wrote:I got into the lovely Kristy Black in a big way lately. I economised by only buying 75 scenes with her, and leaving the other 26 in the store, although a handful of those are on my wishlist.
dap-addict wrote:It's really hard to face it, but I cant buy all DAP scenes I fancy anymore.
I was at 3000 DAP in Summer 2019 and planned for 6000 by this Summer, but I'd need to allocate 1500$ for the next 3 weeks! It's basically possible, but since it wont stop me from buying more after June 21st it wouldn't be wise in terms of sustainability.
Also have to tighten my shopping criteria.
For instance I got attached to some girls I'd bill chubby or MILF in my book and rather re-shedule their DAP scenes hopeing to buy them eventually for free tickets. While it worked fine 2-3years ago, it doenst work anymore now.
How do others trick themselves to spend less, but still support girls, studios and biz?
dap-addict wrote:6. try to get at least stockings, ideally with heels on during most of the sex
dap-addict wrote:Looks like it would be possible to economize quite some large amounts of TKT going to Sheer for porn shopping instead.
Do I get this right?
Ignored Sheer a bit so far, but since I started boycotting some more studios for the time being, this looks like a good alternative option maybe.
Also started thus thread helping to economize ideally: viewtopic.php?f=96&t=67658
xxxVIPERxxx wrote:Thanks, GIO and Gonzo remain my top 2 studios...I buy a fair bit from LTP and NTP on here, but am too lazy to set up another system/platform...even if it saves me money
davebowman wrote:Fingers crossed it sells loads and becomes more than a one-off.
dap-addict wrote:davebowman wrote:Fingers crossed it sells loads and becomes more than a one-off.
I cant buy it now because I just run out of TKT and I dont re-load with my 120TKT re-load option since some latest developments in May.
But anyway, let's really hope Anna de Ville did it on her completely free will and wasnt talked into trying this test. She seems to be dependent mainly on 1 studio only, which might make her more vulnerable. Depends really on the fairness and sustainability level of studio!
xxxVIPERxxx wrote:I am sorry to hear about those latest developments in May that you mentioned @dap-addict. I can relate....
For me, for the past 14 months or so, I had also experienced such problems where I could not regularly reload for personal reasons (my second wife was being extremely controlling with my money/ finances (...)However, for my wife's mental wellbeing, and to match her deep wishes and desires, we decided that a mutual splitting and a divorce was the right thing in the end.
dap-addict wrote:davebowman wrote:Fingers crossed it sells loads and becomes more than a one-off.
I cant buy it now because I just run out of TKT and I dont re-load with my 120TKT re-load option since some latest developments in May.
But anyway, let's really hope Anna de Ville did it on her completely free will and wasnt talked into trying this test. She seems to be dependent mainly on 1 studio only, which might make her more vulnerable. Depends really on the fairness and sustainability level of studio!
Giorgio Grandi wrote:you know what, back off.
I have really enough of you spreading bullshit, doubts and assumptions all around, when you evidently do not have a fucking clue of what you are fucking talking about
Giorgio Grandi wrote:The true is that you are demeaning all female performers to some kind of endangered animal that needs to be protected. It is not like this.
dap-addict wrote:Giorgio Grandi wrote:you know what, back off.
I have really enough of you spreading bullshit, doubts and assumptions all around, when you evidently do not have a fucking clue of what you are fucking talking about
Oh, I see, my message came through.
I'll back off in this, dont worry. Its AdV's decision - and for sure shared profits is an experiment worth trying. It could actually lead to a fair profit and risk participation and fuel a fee revolution in Europorn.
On the other hand I know at least 10 female performers who were asked openly or not openly but by referring to seemingly low sales (most of them not visible in sales ranks at least) to perform the same acts as before for lower payment. This was done by different studios in Prague. On top we both are aware of health risks I dont wanna get into here, but they might explain some of my assumptions as you call it. Anyway, girls were asked to perform for less while in Czech inflation still runs high and most other working ppl got less payment cuts, ie. minus 6,7% in "normal" jobs vs. 13% or so in porn jobs.Giorgio Grandi wrote:The true is that you are demeaning all female performers to some kind of endangered animal that needs to be protected. It is not like this.
I do my best to not demean anybody, neither female performers, nor male performers, nor porn studios or directors! This is the reason I always add that there is ofc a big economic pressure now in EU and because of that War for all involved. I am also aware that some girls are more than mean to their fans as well as their employers. And I try to differ who is who. It's sure not as easy as it seems to tell black and white.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests